Stop Teaching Accountability. Start Designing for It.

Richard Sites

At some point, most HR teams get the same assignment:
“We need to build a culture of accountability.”

It usually comes from a well-meaning executive after a project misses its target or a team quietly underperforms for a little too long. You can guess what happens next. There’s a request for leadership training. Maybe a workshop or some communication campaign that encourages people to “own outcomes.”

And if you’re being honest, you probably feel a little skeptical the moment the ask hits your desk.

Because deep down, you know what’s coming:
Another conversation about accountability that doesn't actually change how work gets done.

Accountability doesn’t happen in the classroom

That’s not to say leadership training has no value. It can be meaningful, especially when people are genuinely curious about how to lead better. But accountability, real accountability, isn't something you can train into people.

It’s something you have to design for.

Not in theory. Not in slide decks. But in the way projects are scoped, how decisions get made, and how people are asked to show up once the work starts.

If there’s no sponsor, no clear owner, no decision deadline—then it doesn’t really matter how many people say they’re committed. Because the structure around them still lets drift win.

What we usually blame on culture is often just vague workflow

Here’s a scenario that might sound familiar:
A project kicks off. Everyone agrees it’s important. There’s good energy in the room, lots of nodding, people taking notes.

But then… it drifts.
Tasks get half-done. Deadlines slide. Reviews stall. Eventually, someone asks, “Wait, who’s actually in charge of this?”

And suddenly, the whole thing starts to collapse under its own ambiguity.

This is where HR gets pulled in to help “fix the culture.” But what needs fixing isn’t culture, it’s clarity. What’s missing is the infrastructure that makes ownership visible and necessary.

Accountability is a design problem

Most people want to do good work. They want to make progress, solve problems, and move things forward. But when the systems around them are murky, when no one’s sure who decides what, when timelines are soft and goals keep shifting, it becomes easier to disengage, not because people don’t care, but because the path to impact isn’t clear.

That’s why the fix isn’t motivational. It’s operational.

You don’t teach accountability.
You build it in.

You make sure that every project has a sponsor with decision-making authority. You set deadlines not just to keep things moving, but to force decisions that would otherwise float. You don’t launch training unless someone with actual power is backing the initiative and owns the results.

You build in accountability by requiring it from the start.

What HR can do differently

If you’re tired of being asked to “build accountability” without the tools to actually influence how the work is set up, here are a few moves that matter:

Don’t start without a name. If there’s no sponsor—someone with authority and skin in the game—then hit pause. Not forever, just until someone steps in.

Use deadlines as design tools. Not to apply pressure, but to anchor clarity. Ask, “What do we need to decide by Friday?” and build around that.

Make ownership visible. Who is responsible for the outcome? Not just the tasks—but the result? Say it out loud. Put it in writing. Refer to it often.

Don’t launch training in a vacuum. Tie every initiative to a clear business need, backed by someone who is invested in making it work. If you’re the only one tracking adoption, something’s off.

Treat alignment like an action, not just a conversation. Alignment is not about everyone agreeing; it is about identifying who will make the final decision when tradeoffs arise. That decision-maker should be involved from the very beginning.

You don’t need to teach people to care. Just give them a reason to show up

When people can see how their work connects to results, and when they are included in decisions that matter, they do not need a workshop to feel accountable. They already are.

The real work of accountability isn’t in the messaging. It’s in the structure. In the deadlines, the sponsorship, the clarity of roles, the speed of decisions. That’s where you either reinforce ownership or quietly erode it.

So next time someone asks you to build a culture of accountability, try asking a different question: “Where is accountability missing from the way we work right now?” Because until that part is addressed, the rest is just performance.

Back to blog

Is Your Team is Doing Too Much?

If your training team feels like they’re constantly building but never catching up, you’re not alone. We work with orgs where L&D is stuck in reactive mode—churning out requests instead of improving performance.